Methodology

AfterVote.ch is an observatory of Swiss democracy that tests the campaign arguments of federal and cantonal votes against the facts observed in the years that follow. Every page follows the same method.

Three principles

Independence and neutrality. AfterVote has no party affiliation. The verdicts concern the campaign arguments, not the outcome of the vote. We never say whether a vote should have been accepted or rejected — we check what was claimed.

Strict verifiability. We only treat verifiable arguments — those that can be tested against facts observed since the vote. Purely counterfactual predictions (“what would have happened without the measure”) are set aside by design: by their very nature they can neither be confirmed nor refuted.

Cited sources. Every verdict is backed by one or more public sources (FSO, FDFA, SNB, ECtHR, Parliament, etc.) explicitly referenced beneath the argument. Every factual claim must be traceable to its source.

The four verdicts

Structure of a page

Every page follows the same structure: context, actors and figures, arguments FOR and AGAINST with verdicts, sourced factual assessment, editorial analysis. This structure is deliberately identical from one page to the next to facilitate comparison and reading.

Accepted vs rejected initiative

What is “testable” depends on the outcome:

Updates

Pages are updated when new facts warrant it. If you spot an error, a missing source or a forgotten argument, write to us via the Contact page.